Talk:Nemesis Inferno

Nemesis Inferno has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 26, 2013. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nemesis Inferno article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amusement Parks: Merlin Entertainments / UK / Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Merlin Entertainments task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by UK Theme Parks (inactive) (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trivia

I went ahead and removed the trivia section and merged the two useful points into the article. Whilst the "Balls of Steel" excerpt was interesting it is (in my opinion) a pure trivia statement and not really belonging in an encyclopedia (plus not cited). If anyone can find an appropriate citation for it and feel that it belongs in the article then please feel free to re-add it. SUB2007 21:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nemesis Inferno/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Is it Nemesis Inferno or Nemesis Inferno?
"It stands 29 metres" -> "The ride... (the last thing you mentioned was the volcano).
Link inversion the first time appropriately.
" just after" remain encyclopaedic, so say either "after" or quantify it.
"was installed to help transform Thorpe Park into a thrill park" wow, this really doesn't sound like an encyclopedic article now, is this a quote? if so quote it and attribute it. If not, neutralise the tone and language.
Some confusion. Is it Nemesis or Nemesis at Alton Towers, or something else?

Just a quick run through, so put it on hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I think I have fixed these issues. Not quite sure what you mean on the last one. The ride at Thorpe Park, which this article is about is "Nemesis Inferno", while the ride at Alton Towers is simply "Nemesis". Was there a particular point you found confusing? I have done a slight reword of that paragraph in the reception section to hopefully remove any confusion. Themeparkgc Talk 02:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nemesis Inferno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]